<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;Big Bang Theory&#8217; exclusive: Christine Baranski returns!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ausiellofiles.ew.com/2009/11/10/big-bang-theory-exclusive-christine-baranski-returns/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ausiellofiles.ew.com/2009/11/10/big-bang-theory-exclusive-christine-baranski-returns/</link>
	<description>Exclusive TV News and Scoop</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 01:05:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Carlos Roa</title>
		<link>http://ausiellofiles.ew.com/2009/11/10/big-bang-theory-exclusive-christine-baranski-returns/comment-page-4/#comment-150443</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos Roa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 21:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ausiellofiles.ew.com/?p=3961#comment-150443</guid>
		<description>They match perfectly as mates to make suffer poor Leonard, hehhehe...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They match perfectly as mates to make suffer poor Leonard, hehhehe&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brittany</title>
		<link>http://ausiellofiles.ew.com/2009/11/10/big-bang-theory-exclusive-christine-baranski-returns/comment-page-4/#comment-145566</link>
		<dc:creator>Brittany</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 17:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ausiellofiles.ew.com/?p=3961#comment-145566</guid>
		<description>Actually, on Tvfanatic&#039;s website, they have a picture for this episode and Leonard&#039;s mom is kissing Sheldon, he&#039;s got a sort of &quot;What the frack?!&quot; expression on his face.  It took me a few minutes to process when I saw it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, on Tvfanatic&#8217;s website, they have a picture for this episode and Leonard&#8217;s mom is kissing Sheldon, he&#8217;s got a sort of &#8220;What the frack?!&#8221; expression on his face.  It took me a few minutes to process when I saw it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steffi</title>
		<link>http://ausiellofiles.ew.com/2009/11/10/big-bang-theory-exclusive-christine-baranski-returns/comment-page-4/#comment-144418</link>
		<dc:creator>Steffi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 22:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ausiellofiles.ew.com/?p=3961#comment-144418</guid>
		<description>Love love love Christine Baranski. Totally hope that this coming episode will be as great as the last she was in, but seeing her and Sheldon together in a romantic scene...I don&#039;t think I&#039;d be ready for that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love love love Christine Baranski. Totally hope that this coming episode will be as great as the last she was in, but seeing her and Sheldon together in a romantic scene&#8230;I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;d be ready for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jess</title>
		<link>http://ausiellofiles.ew.com/2009/11/10/big-bang-theory-exclusive-christine-baranski-returns/comment-page-4/#comment-141032</link>
		<dc:creator>jess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 02:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ausiellofiles.ew.com/?p=3961#comment-141032</guid>
		<description>Christine Baranski would NEVER!!! She&#039;s too classy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christine Baranski would NEVER!!! She&#8217;s too classy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jennifer</title>
		<link>http://ausiellofiles.ew.com/2009/11/10/big-bang-theory-exclusive-christine-baranski-returns/comment-page-4/#comment-139221</link>
		<dc:creator>jennifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 12:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ausiellofiles.ew.com/?p=3961#comment-139221</guid>
		<description>Re: last night&#039;s episode:  Yayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: last night&#8217;s episode:  Yayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz</title>
		<link>http://ausiellofiles.ew.com/2009/11/10/big-bang-theory-exclusive-christine-baranski-returns/comment-page-4/#comment-138984</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 23:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ausiellofiles.ew.com/?p=3961#comment-138984</guid>
		<description>Lynn, I&#039;m done discussing this here. To me, it is you who are choosing to ignore the obvious implications because you simply do not like what you&#039;re seeing. Yes, as a matter of fact, I DO believe everyone has the right to interpret a scene the way they so choose (and enjoy the show as they want to!),  but even I (being the large PS shipper that I am) can admit that there ARE instances in the past where Sheldon comes off as asexual. Why, then, can you not at least ADMIT that in this particular instance they *might* just be using the other side of the coin as a promotional tactic? If anyone is a hypocrite...

And if we are not supposed to pick up any sexual undertones, WHY even use this scene in the first place for the 20 second promo? There at least 6 different scenes I know of in tonight&#039;s episode that could have been utilized to promote but they chose to run with the one that has Sheldon touching Penny&#039;s breast. (...?) And interesting still is the wording they are using; &quot;Damsel in Distress&quot;; &quot;To Save her&quot;; the Superman theme song playing in the background... and *usually* there are romantic tones connected to the Superhero and Damsel in Distress, if you weren&#039;t already aware. So, clearly Penny and Sheldon are supposed to be paralleled to these roles. How you are not putting two and two together is beyond me. (In fact, I would like to be enlightened as to how *else* you can interpret this wording?)

Anyway, I am out of this conversation, whatever you &quot;choose&quot; to believe is fine. We will both see what happens in future episodes and beating the dead horse on a thread like this is not going to change that fact one iota.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lynn, I&#8217;m done discussing this here. To me, it is you who are choosing to ignore the obvious implications because you simply do not like what you&#8217;re seeing. Yes, as a matter of fact, I DO believe everyone has the right to interpret a scene the way they so choose (and enjoy the show as they want to!),  but even I (being the large PS shipper that I am) can admit that there ARE instances in the past where Sheldon comes off as asexual. Why, then, can you not at least ADMIT that in this particular instance they *might* just be using the other side of the coin as a promotional tactic? If anyone is a hypocrite&#8230;</p>
<p>And if we are not supposed to pick up any sexual undertones, WHY even use this scene in the first place for the 20 second promo? There at least 6 different scenes I know of in tonight&#8217;s episode that could have been utilized to promote but they chose to run with the one that has Sheldon touching Penny&#8217;s breast. (&#8230;?) And interesting still is the wording they are using; &#8220;Damsel in Distress&#8221;; &#8220;To Save her&#8221;; the Superman theme song playing in the background&#8230; and *usually* there are romantic tones connected to the Superhero and Damsel in Distress, if you weren&#8217;t already aware. So, clearly Penny and Sheldon are supposed to be paralleled to these roles. How you are not putting two and two together is beyond me. (In fact, I would like to be enlightened as to how *else* you can interpret this wording?)</p>
<p>Anyway, I am out of this conversation, whatever you &#8220;choose&#8221; to believe is fine. We will both see what happens in future episodes and beating the dead horse on a thread like this is not going to change that fact one iota.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz</title>
		<link>http://ausiellofiles.ew.com/2009/11/10/big-bang-theory-exclusive-christine-baranski-returns/comment-page-4/#comment-138685</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 09:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ausiellofiles.ew.com/?p=3961#comment-138685</guid>
		<description>To Lynn and Reese:

I want to apologize for the tone of my above post. I was over-tired and responded sharply when I didn&#039;t honestly didn&#039;t intend to start a heated debate here. I still stand by my arguments but I do want to respectfully request that we agree to disagree as we are not likely going to come to any resolution on the subject. 

Liz</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Lynn and Reese:</p>
<p>I want to apologize for the tone of my above post. I was over-tired and responded sharply when I didn&#8217;t honestly didn&#8217;t intend to start a heated debate here. I still stand by my arguments but I do want to respectfully request that we agree to disagree as we are not likely going to come to any resolution on the subject. </p>
<p>Liz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynn</title>
		<link>http://ausiellofiles.ew.com/2009/11/10/big-bang-theory-exclusive-christine-baranski-returns/comment-page-4/#comment-138645</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 04:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ausiellofiles.ew.com/?p=3961#comment-138645</guid>
		<description>First of all, I will say I apologize if I misread your comment re: critics. However, I still believe that your sampling of fans is likely skewed in favor of your interests (as mine would be as well), so I will repeat my comment earlier that there is no concrete proof that the fanbase sways heavily for or against this particular ship. Unless we were to conduct a blind sample of nielsen viewers (which is an inherently flawed system in and of itself, though more accurate than random internet polling), we&#039;re likely to never have remotely accurate data on the subject.

Second, I am seriously saying that when I watch that scene in the preview I do not see sexual undertones. Because to me, sexual undertones requires lust/desire from one or both of the characters, which I do not see in either (rather, when Penny realized where his hand was, her face read to me as one of disgust and annoyance, and his face read to me of uncomfortable awkwardness). Whether other TV shows succumb to over sexualized tropes or not has nothing to do with the way this show is run, nor does it have anything to do with what I see in this show. Because though I find the show suffers from a lot of sitcom cliches, the characters have never fully felt to me like cliches themselves. You do not have to believe that. You are free to see all the sexual innuendo that you want. I&#039;ve said repeatedly you are free to interpret whatever you want, but please do not tell me that I must see this promo way you do. That you can be so hypocritical to say I should not claim definitively that Sheldon is asexual (though I never actually made such a claim; defending asexuality as a legitimate orientation and backing up my opinion with likeminded quotes from the showrunners is not the same as suggesting you or anyone else MUST fall in line) while telling me I MUST see a promo the way you do (which again, I do not) is frustrating at best and reason enough to end this, as you are clearly incapable of having a rational discussion that allows for multiple points of view other than your own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, I will say I apologize if I misread your comment re: critics. However, I still believe that your sampling of fans is likely skewed in favor of your interests (as mine would be as well), so I will repeat my comment earlier that there is no concrete proof that the fanbase sways heavily for or against this particular ship. Unless we were to conduct a blind sample of nielsen viewers (which is an inherently flawed system in and of itself, though more accurate than random internet polling), we&#8217;re likely to never have remotely accurate data on the subject.</p>
<p>Second, I am seriously saying that when I watch that scene in the preview I do not see sexual undertones. Because to me, sexual undertones requires lust/desire from one or both of the characters, which I do not see in either (rather, when Penny realized where his hand was, her face read to me as one of disgust and annoyance, and his face read to me of uncomfortable awkwardness). Whether other TV shows succumb to over sexualized tropes or not has nothing to do with the way this show is run, nor does it have anything to do with what I see in this show. Because though I find the show suffers from a lot of sitcom cliches, the characters have never fully felt to me like cliches themselves. You do not have to believe that. You are free to see all the sexual innuendo that you want. I&#8217;ve said repeatedly you are free to interpret whatever you want, but please do not tell me that I must see this promo way you do. That you can be so hypocritical to say I should not claim definitively that Sheldon is asexual (though I never actually made such a claim; defending asexuality as a legitimate orientation and backing up my opinion with likeminded quotes from the showrunners is not the same as suggesting you or anyone else MUST fall in line) while telling me I MUST see a promo the way you do (which again, I do not) is frustrating at best and reason enough to end this, as you are clearly incapable of having a rational discussion that allows for multiple points of view other than your own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz</title>
		<link>http://ausiellofiles.ew.com/2009/11/10/big-bang-theory-exclusive-christine-baranski-returns/comment-page-4/#comment-138601</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ausiellofiles.ew.com/?p=3961#comment-138601</guid>
		<description>First, you both massively misread what I wrote about the critics. I said that perhaps NOT all want romance but that they DO enjoy the Penny/Sheldon scenes. Period. I&#039;m not suggesting that everyone who does not &#039;ship LP wants SP together in a romantic way. But I did say that WITHIN the large chunk of people liking those SP scenes, there ARE a large number who DO want romance. And yes, this is a fact as I converse with at least 100 out of the 1500 I know of on a daily basis!
Please do not put words in my mouth. I never said that ALL reviews/reviewers want them together romantically, rather that SP *IS* where the interest lies as opposed to LP based on the critiques that I have read. And I&#039;ll have you know that I do not only read the &quot;good PS reviews&quot; I want to know what everyone is saying so I make sure I research more than just what I want to hear. So I think it is you both who need to re-read what I wrote.

And as for the sexual undertones; I&#039;m jaw-dropped here. Are you *seriously* trying to tell me that CBS ISN&#039;T promoting this episode WITHOUT that on their mind??? Uh, sorry but YEAH, RIIIIIGHT!  You cannot have a character touch a female character&#039;s BREAST on a sitcom (and make a JOKE out of it!) without the audience automatically jumping to sex. It is part of television culture (and I suppose mass culture-culture at that!) as it has been for 50-odd years and there&#039;s no changing it now. 
I&#039;d like for either of you to give me one example on a sitcom where something similar has happened and we WEREN&#039;T supposed to laugh at it BECAUSE of those undertones. Hint: you won&#039;t find one. I agree that how we interpret the scene as a whole is up to you but not this promo! 

Anyway, this argument is becoming redundant. I don&#039;t feel like debating this any further when it&#039;s clear that neither party is going to come to an agreement.

I&#039;m proposing that we agree to disagree and I hope you&#039;ll accept.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, you both massively misread what I wrote about the critics. I said that perhaps NOT all want romance but that they DO enjoy the Penny/Sheldon scenes. Period. I&#8217;m not suggesting that everyone who does not &#8217;ship LP wants SP together in a romantic way. But I did say that WITHIN the large chunk of people liking those SP scenes, there ARE a large number who DO want romance. And yes, this is a fact as I converse with at least 100 out of the 1500 I know of on a daily basis!<br />
Please do not put words in my mouth. I never said that ALL reviews/reviewers want them together romantically, rather that SP *IS* where the interest lies as opposed to LP based on the critiques that I have read. And I&#8217;ll have you know that I do not only read the &#8220;good PS reviews&#8221; I want to know what everyone is saying so I make sure I research more than just what I want to hear. So I think it is you both who need to re-read what I wrote.</p>
<p>And as for the sexual undertones; I&#8217;m jaw-dropped here. Are you *seriously* trying to tell me that CBS ISN&#8217;T promoting this episode WITHOUT that on their mind??? Uh, sorry but YEAH, RIIIIIGHT!  You cannot have a character touch a female character&#8217;s BREAST on a sitcom (and make a JOKE out of it!) without the audience automatically jumping to sex. It is part of television culture (and I suppose mass culture-culture at that!) as it has been for 50-odd years and there&#8217;s no changing it now.<br />
I&#8217;d like for either of you to give me one example on a sitcom where something similar has happened and we WEREN&#8217;T supposed to laugh at it BECAUSE of those undertones. Hint: you won&#8217;t find one. I agree that how we interpret the scene as a whole is up to you but not this promo! </p>
<p>Anyway, this argument is becoming redundant. I don&#8217;t feel like debating this any further when it&#8217;s clear that neither party is going to come to an agreement.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m proposing that we agree to disagree and I hope you&#8217;ll accept.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reese</title>
		<link>http://ausiellofiles.ew.com/2009/11/10/big-bang-theory-exclusive-christine-baranski-returns/comment-page-4/#comment-138589</link>
		<dc:creator>Reese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 23:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ausiellofiles.ew.com/?p=3961#comment-138589</guid>
		<description>LoL I love Penny and Sheldon&#039;s interactions, it&#039;s one of my favorite parts of the show. And I dislike Leonard and Penny as a couple (though I think they have potential, I&#039;m just not feeling it at the moment). But that doesn&#039;t mean I want Penny and Sheldon to get together. People can like platonic relationships! Just because you want them together doesn&#039;t mean you should project your preference onto every critic, unless they&#039;ve said for fact that they want to see a romantic relationship. I have yet to read any (aside from a few small fan bloggers) say this, actually.

And Liz, maybe you should reread your comment on interpretations and not stating opinions like fact. You see next week as being full of sexual undertones, but that does not mean that everyone does. So you should refrain from speaking about it as if it&#039;s a fact that this is what is happening and is the showrunner&#039;s intention with the episode. ESPECIALLY when it hasn&#039;t even aired and we haven&#039;t seen how it is going to play out</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LoL I love Penny and Sheldon&#8217;s interactions, it&#8217;s one of my favorite parts of the show. And I dislike Leonard and Penny as a couple (though I think they have potential, I&#8217;m just not feeling it at the moment). But that doesn&#8217;t mean I want Penny and Sheldon to get together. People can like platonic relationships! Just because you want them together doesn&#8217;t mean you should project your preference onto every critic, unless they&#8217;ve said for fact that they want to see a romantic relationship. I have yet to read any (aside from a few small fan bloggers) say this, actually.</p>
<p>And Liz, maybe you should reread your comment on interpretations and not stating opinions like fact. You see next week as being full of sexual undertones, but that does not mean that everyone does. So you should refrain from speaking about it as if it&#8217;s a fact that this is what is happening and is the showrunner&#8217;s intention with the episode. ESPECIALLY when it hasn&#8217;t even aired and we haven&#8217;t seen how it is going to play out</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
