<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Casting Scoops: &#8216;The Closer,&#8217; &#8216;Sarah Connor,&#8217; &#8216;Medium,&#8217; &#8216;CSI: NY,&#8217; and more!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ausiellofiles.ew.com/2009/02/27/casting-scoops-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ausiellofiles.ew.com/2009/02/27/casting-scoops-4/</link>
	<description>Exclusive TV News and Scoop</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 01:05:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Arlene Herring</title>
		<link>http://ausiellofiles.ew.com/2009/02/27/casting-scoops-4/comment-page-3/#comment-28119</link>
		<dc:creator>Arlene Herring</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 21:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ewausiello.wordpress.com/2009/02/27/casting-scoops-4#comment-28119</guid>
		<description>Love Dean Winters in as many shows as he can handle. Does Medium scoop mean you know something about where NBC&#039;s 10 p.m. shows will be going after Leno zooms in on their time slot? Do tell. Please.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love Dean Winters in as many shows as he can handle. Does Medium scoop mean you know something about where NBC&#8217;s 10 p.m. shows will be going after Leno zooms in on their time slot? Do tell. Please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michele</title>
		<link>http://ausiellofiles.ew.com/2009/02/27/casting-scoops-4/comment-page-3/#comment-28118</link>
		<dc:creator>Michele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 04:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ewausiello.wordpress.com/2009/02/27/casting-scoops-4#comment-28118</guid>
		<description>Dean Winters being everywhere? Awesome. Can&#039;t wait.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dean Winters being everywhere? Awesome. Can&#8217;t wait.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://ausiellofiles.ew.com/2009/02/27/casting-scoops-4/comment-page-3/#comment-28117</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 02:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ewausiello.wordpress.com/2009/02/27/casting-scoops-4#comment-28117</guid>
		<description>Indeed, the range of an aggregate of studies falls between 5-10% (re: 1994 NORC Sex Study, the 1976 and 1981 Hite Reports, the CDC study of American Sexual Behavior, etc.). Any data on homosexuality by the US Census should be disregarded, as the most recent census in 2000 failed to directly survey sexual orientation. And many reports claiming less than 4% have neglected to account for bisexuality. If only studying the sexuality of males or females, the rates are indeed closer to the claim of 2%. Please elaborate on why you thing the Kinsey report was &quot;BS.&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed, the range of an aggregate of studies falls between 5-10% (re: 1994 NORC Sex Study, the 1976 and 1981 Hite Reports, the CDC study of American Sexual Behavior, etc.). Any data on homosexuality by the US Census should be disregarded, as the most recent census in 2000 failed to directly survey sexual orientation. And many reports claiming less than 4% have neglected to account for bisexuality. If only studying the sexuality of males or females, the rates are indeed closer to the claim of 2%. Please elaborate on why you thing the Kinsey report was &#8220;BS.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: To Phil</title>
		<link>http://ausiellofiles.ew.com/2009/02/27/casting-scoops-4/comment-page-3/#comment-28116</link>
		<dc:creator>To Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 16:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ewausiello.wordpress.com/2009/02/27/casting-scoops-4#comment-28116</guid>
		<description>Actually, Billy is much closer. The 10% thing is BS made up by Kinsey. Even really generous estimates from pro-gay studies put the number at around 5%. Self-reporting for official surveys (like a census) is only around 2%.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Billy is much closer. The 10% thing is BS made up by Kinsey. Even really generous estimates from pro-gay studies put the number at around 5%. Self-reporting for official surveys (like a census) is only around 2%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles J</title>
		<link>http://ausiellofiles.ew.com/2009/02/27/casting-scoops-4/comment-page-3/#comment-28115</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 07:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ewausiello.wordpress.com/2009/02/27/casting-scoops-4#comment-28115</guid>
		<description>Very snarky, pitifuly nit-picky remark:
Was EW unable to get a picture of Kyra, so they opted for a somewhat realistic painting instead? That left-third of the photo looks... so out of place.
Very excited that Dean Winters will be back on Terminator. Even more excited about Life on Mars. That should make for some excellent television.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very snarky, pitifuly nit-picky remark:<br />
Was EW unable to get a picture of Kyra, so they opted for a somewhat realistic painting instead? That left-third of the photo looks&#8230; so out of place.<br />
Very excited that Dean Winters will be back on Terminator. Even more excited about Life on Mars. That should make for some excellent television.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://ausiellofiles.ew.com/2009/02/27/casting-scoops-4/comment-page-3/#comment-28114</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 04:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ewausiello.wordpress.com/2009/02/27/casting-scoops-4#comment-28114</guid>
		<description>I think the natural rate of homosexuality in a human population is closer to around 10%, not 2%. Claiming 50% of characters portrayed on television shows are homosexual is a gross exaggeration. And it does seem a majority of those portraying homosexual characters are women and bisexual women, despite the lower rates of female homosexuality. But all that can be easily attributed to the fact that America, despite all the progression amidst the centuries, is still a patriarchal society, still acting on and thinking with flawed traditional ideologies. Until society is prompted by compassion to change, distancing from oppressively and offensively androcentric thought and moving forward to true egalitarianism, the objectification bisexual women will continue to be paraded on television shows in their misguided attempt not to alienate that aforementioned +-10% of the population.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the natural rate of homosexuality in a human population is closer to around 10%, not 2%. Claiming 50% of characters portrayed on television shows are homosexual is a gross exaggeration. And it does seem a majority of those portraying homosexual characters are women and bisexual women, despite the lower rates of female homosexuality. But all that can be easily attributed to the fact that America, despite all the progression amidst the centuries, is still a patriarchal society, still acting on and thinking with flawed traditional ideologies. Until society is prompted by compassion to change, distancing from oppressively and offensively androcentric thought and moving forward to true egalitarianism, the objectification bisexual women will continue to be paraded on television shows in their misguided attempt not to alienate that aforementioned +-10% of the population.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://ausiellofiles.ew.com/2009/02/27/casting-scoops-4/comment-page-2/#comment-28113</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 04:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ewausiello.wordpress.com/2009/02/27/casting-scoops-4#comment-28113</guid>
		<description>I love Christa Miller.  She&#039;s been fantastic on Scrubs, and I&#039;d watch anything she appears in.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love Christa Miller.  She&#8217;s been fantastic on Scrubs, and I&#8217;d watch anything she appears in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manny</title>
		<link>http://ausiellofiles.ew.com/2009/02/27/casting-scoops-4/comment-page-2/#comment-28112</link>
		<dc:creator>Manny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 02:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ewausiello.wordpress.com/2009/02/27/casting-scoops-4#comment-28112</guid>
		<description>Sorry Mary...
In your world we dont exsist and how dare we pop up on your favorite shows.  Go watch the Trinity Channel cuz there are no gays there (laughing inside)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Mary&#8230;<br />
In your world we dont exsist and how dare we pop up on your favorite shows.  Go watch the Trinity Channel cuz there are no gays there (laughing inside)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billy</title>
		<link>http://ausiellofiles.ew.com/2009/02/27/casting-scoops-4/comment-page-2/#comment-28111</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 23:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ewausiello.wordpress.com/2009/02/27/casting-scoops-4#comment-28111</guid>
		<description>Why are 90% of the gay people on TV women? Weird.  Why are 50% of people on TV shows now gay, when 2% of people call themselves gay?
Has anyone else seen this site where you can win prizes while using Google as your
search engine?
http://bytle.com/swagbucks
Fellow Smallville fans, hurray for Season 9!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are 90% of the gay people on TV women? Weird.  Why are 50% of people on TV shows now gay, when 2% of people call themselves gay?<br />
Has anyone else seen this site where you can win prizes while using Google as your<br />
search engine?<br />
<a href="http://bytle.com/swagbucks" rel="nofollow">http://bytle.com/swagbucks</a><br />
Fellow Smallville fans, hurray for Season 9!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rory</title>
		<link>http://ausiellofiles.ew.com/2009/02/27/casting-scoops-4/comment-page-2/#comment-28110</link>
		<dc:creator>Rory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 15:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ewausiello.wordpress.com/2009/02/27/casting-scoops-4#comment-28110</guid>
		<description>With Christa Miller on &quot;Cougar Town,&quot; I sense a lot of slag smacking coming.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With Christa Miller on &#8220;Cougar Town,&#8221; I sense a lot of slag smacking coming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
