Comments on: This Just In: Another ‘90210′ Alum Heads For the ‘Hills’

By: vicki

vicki — Wed, 03 Sep 2008 11:25:55 +0000

hi i just wanna know when da new 90210 is cumming back 2 channle ten

By: lindeta

lindeta — Mon, 04 Aug 2008 23:35:40 +0000

to talk about the new 90210 meet other 200 fans here waiting the show!!!!
http://90210fans20.proboards81.com/

By: Jim

Jim — Mon, 28 Jul 2008 14:15:30 +0000

“. . . but a good part of it was due to Shannon leaving the show.”
Do you have a source that proves this to be a fact?
Creatively, her material was not as interesting after they separated her from Luke, so I’m not so sure how it could’ve made much difference. At any rate, the fact that the show went on, with or without her, is proof that more people were ‘90210′ fans than mere Brenda fans.
And again, I like Brenda and Shannen too, but I’m among those who were fans of the entire show first and foremost.

By: Jim

Jim — Mon, 28 Jul 2008 14:15:27 +0000

By: joe

joe — Sat, 26 Jul 2008 19:08:13 +0000

why dont they get rid of the new cast and just call this 90210 part 2 the middle age years it seems that all we here about is the cast members from the original show but what about the new cast i thought it was cool that they at first were going to have kelly come back but after donna brenda nat and now kellys mom jackie are coming back people are going to think that its going the old chactors is the show its got a new cast remeber

By: Brian

Brian — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 20:06:24 +0000

Sure she was only on the show for the first four seasons. Yes the show went on for six seasons following her departure…but the ratings also went down following her departure. It certainly didn’t have to do entirely with her departure (mostly due to the fact that the show became a more of a primetime soap opera with hard to believe story lines) but a good part of it was due to Shannon leaving the show.

By: Jim

Jim — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:51:56 +0000

“plus, i dont get all the excitement about shannen. she does not define 90210. she was on for 4 years. there were 6 more years without her, which means she wasn’t even on it for half its run. there is so much more to the show beyond her.”
Completely agree with this. I generally liked Brenda/Shannen too, but some of her admirers exaggerate. Without Dylan, her final stories weren’t really anything special. The fact is the show lasted longer without her than with her. It’ll be interesting to see her again to see if she lives up to the praise her fans tend to heap.
Apart from that, this is great news. I’m really looking forward to seeing Jackie again, and watching her interact with Kelly. Now if we could just get Jason/Brandon to come back…

By: 90210grl

90210grl — Thu, 24 Jul 2008 20:56:56 +0000

i know things can change in 8 years, i guess i think of series finale being the end and youre supposed to believe that’s how things stay. plus, i dont get all the excitement about shannen. she does not define 90210. she was on for 4 years. there were 6 more years without her, which means she wasn’t even on it for half its run. there is so much more to the show beyond her.

By: JeniLee

JeniLee — Thu, 24 Jul 2008 20:22:22 +0000

90210grl…not all fans were completely happy with the ending….many Brandon/Kelly and Brenda/Dylan fans including myself were not happy with Kelly and Dylan ending up together. I would looooove to see them split up again haha

By: PGP

PGP — Thu, 24 Jul 2008 19:08:53 +0000

I don’t know if I will watch this show all the way through, but I will probably check it out! I love that Jennie Garth is on board, could care less about Shannen or Tori, but Theissen’s Valarie will seal the deal for me!!!!